From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263557AbTJCAZt (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Oct 2003 20:25:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263563AbTJCAZt (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Oct 2003 20:25:49 -0400 Received: from adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net ([63.194.239.202]:52486 "EHLO mmp-linux.matchmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263557AbTJCAZr (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Oct 2003 20:25:47 -0400 Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 17:26:08 -0700 From: Mike Fedyk To: Dave O Cc: Roman Zippel , linux-hfsplus-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] new HFS(+) driver Message-ID: <20031003002608.GC13051@matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave O , Roman Zippel , linux-hfsplus-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 02:00:25PM -0500, Dave O wrote: > This works, however du(1) seems to get the block size wrong: > > meatloop:/cdrom# ls -l > total 393244 > -rwxr-xr-x 1 501 dialout 341952833 Sep 22 17:24 else.zip > -rwxr-xr-x 1 501 dialout 450701627 Sep 22 20:07 outlook.zip > -rwxr-xr-x 1 501 dialout 607534655 Sep 22 17:26 quick1.zip > -rwxr-xr-x 1 501 dialout 431279243 Sep 22 17:26 quick2.zip > -rwxr-xr-x 1 501 dialout 605501959 Sep 22 17:27 quick3.zip > -rwxr-xr-x 1 501 dialout 403836898 Sep 22 17:28 quick4.zip > -rwxr-xr-x 1 501 dialout 380636073 Sep 22 17:28 quick5.zip > > meatloop:/cdrom# du -sh > 385M . Are you sure? I haven't done the math, but you are comparing base 1000 to base 1024 numbers. Try comparing: du -sh . ls -lh