From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263627AbTJCJD3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Oct 2003 05:03:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263646AbTJCJD3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Oct 2003 05:03:29 -0400 Received: from rth.ninka.net ([216.101.162.244]:12687 "EHLO rth.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263627AbTJCJD2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Oct 2003 05:03:28 -0400 Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 02:03:17 -0700 From: "David S. Miller" To: Michal Kochanowicz Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6.0-test6] definition and usage of __u64/__s64 inconsistent? Message-Id: <20031003020317.4d582970.davem@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20031003085412.GA4602@wieszak.lan> References: <20031003085412.GA4602@wieszak.lan> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 10:54:12 +0200 Michal Kochanowicz wrote: > The file asm/types.h is _unconditionally_ included from linux/cdrom.h > and linux/loop.h and both files use __u64 unonditionally. Isn't this an > error? Not really. We could fix this by using the __extension__ keyword and thereby get rid of the __STRICT_ANSI__ check and situations like your's would work.