[2.6.0-test5-mm2] no /proc/bus/i2c but i2c-core module loaded + small oops

[2.6.0-test5-mm2] no /proc/bus/i2c but i2c-core module loaded + small oops

[Philippe Gramoullé]

 Hello,

Symptoms: modprobe i2c-core works fine but /proc/bus/i2c doesn't exist

Kernel  : Stock 2.6.0-test5-mm2
Distro  : Debian Sid + 2.8 lm-sensors user space utilities
Hardware: Dell WS 530MT SMP Xeon 1.5 Ghz, Intel Motherboard Chipset: 82801BA , ADM1023
	  00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp. 82801BA/BAM SMBus (rev 04)

Also while rmmoding  i2c-dev module, i got the following message:


Device class 'i2c-0' does not have a release() function, it is broken and must be fixed.
Badness in class_dev_release at drivers/base/class.c:200

Call Trace:
 [<c0227ef5>] kobject_cleanup+0x75/0x80
 [<e0b42c3a>] i2cdev_detach_adapter+0x2a/0x40 [i2c_dev]
 [<e0b3b7e9>] i2c_del_driver+0x1d9/0x230 [i2c_core]
 [<e0b42c92>] i2c_dev_exit+0x12/0x37 [i2c_dev]
 [<c013ac33>] sys_delete_module+0x133/0x160
 [<c0152274>] sys_munmap+0x44/0x70
 [<c0386e13>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb


Thanks,

Philippe

Re: [2.6.0-test5-mm2] no /proc/bus/i2c but i2c-core module loaded + small oops

[Greg KH]

On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 04:30:53AM +0200, Philippe Gramoullé wrote:
> 
>  Hello,
> 
> Symptoms: modprobe i2c-core works fine but /proc/bus/i2c doesn't exist

/proc/bus/i2c will never exist :)

lmsensors has not been ported to 2.6 yet, sorry.  Look in /sys/bus/i2c
for the devices and sensors.

> Device class 'i2c-0' does not have a release() function, it is broken and must be fixed.
> Badness in class_dev_release at drivers/base/class.c:200

bah, forget to fix this one up.  Will get to it in the next few days.

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: [2.6.0-test5-mm2] no /proc/bus/i2c but i2c-core module loaded + small oops

[Philippe Gramoullé]

Hello Greg,

On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 21:33:25 -0700
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:

  | On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 04:30:53AM +0200, Philippe Gramoullé wrote:
  | > 
  | >  Hello,
  | > 
  | > Symptoms: modprobe i2c-core works fine but /proc/bus/i2c doesn't exist
  | 
  | /proc/bus/i2c will never exist :)

Well, ok :) No need to say that i didn't follow closely recent evolutions 
regarding i2c. I just read but documentation but obviously not for the right kernel :)
  | 
  | lmsensors has not been ported to 2.6 yet, sorry.  Look in /sys/bus/i2c
  | for the devices and sensors.

Ok Thx. Will do.
  | 
  | > Device class 'i2c-0' does not have a release() function, it is broken and must be fixed.
  | > Badness in class_dev_release at drivers/base/class.c:200
  | 
  | bah, forget to fix this one up.  Will get to it in the next few days.

Ok. Hope that it helped.

  | 
  | thanks,

Thanks to you.

  | 
  | greg k-h

Bye,

Philippe

Re: [2.6.0-test5-mm2] no /proc/bus/i2c but i2c-core module loaded + small oops

[Ed Sweetman]

Go check out sysfs.  i2c no longer uses proc. AFAIK system related proc 
entries will all move to sysfs.


No idea about the rmmod error.


Philippe Gramoullé wrote:
>  Hello,
> 
> Symptoms: modprobe i2c-core works fine but /proc/bus/i2c doesn't exist
> 
> Kernel  : Stock 2.6.0-test5-mm2
> Distro  : Debian Sid + 2.8 lm-sensors user space utilities
> Hardware: Dell WS 530MT SMP Xeon 1.5 Ghz, Intel Motherboard Chipset: 82801BA , ADM1023
> 	  00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp. 82801BA/BAM SMBus (rev 04)
> 
> Also while rmmoding  i2c-dev module, i got the following message:
> 
> 
> Device class 'i2c-0' does not have a release() function, it is broken and must be fixed.
> Badness in class_dev_release at drivers/base/class.c:200
> 
> Call Trace:
>  [<c0227ef5>] kobject_cleanup+0x75/0x80
>  [<e0b42c3a>] i2cdev_detach_adapter+0x2a/0x40 [i2c_dev]
>  [<e0b3b7e9>] i2c_del_driver+0x1d9/0x230 [i2c_core]
>  [<e0b42c92>] i2c_dev_exit+0x12/0x37 [i2c_dev]
>  [<c013ac33>] sys_delete_module+0x133/0x160
>  [<c0152274>] sys_munmap+0x44/0x70
>  [<c0386e13>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Philippe
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>