public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* segfault error on x86_64
@ 2003-10-02 21:53 bvds
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: bvds @ 2003-10-02 21:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel; +Cc: bvds


I have kernel 2.4.22 compiled with gcc 3.3 running on a 
dual AMD Opteron (in 64 bit mode).  
There is an error message that occurs about twice a day at random times:

Sep 30 23:45:00 gideon kernel: bumps[12960]: segfault at 0000002a95611000 rip 0000000000402150 rsp 0000007fbffff1a8 error 6
Oct  1 10:26:57 gideon kernel: bumps[13510]: segfault at 0000002a95611000 rip 0000000000402150 rsp 0000007fbffff1a8 error 6

As far as I can tell, there is no other effect than this message.
(the system keeps running OK).

What is "bumps" ?

BvdS

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: segfault error on x86_64
       [not found] <20031002215345.A1D33E24D6@bvds.geneva.edu.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
@ 2003-10-03  8:20 ` Andi Kleen
  2003-10-03  8:44   ` Mitchell Blank Jr
                     ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2003-10-03  8:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bvds; +Cc: linux-kernel

<bvds@bvds.geneva.edu> writes:

> I have kernel 2.4.22 compiled with gcc 3.3 running on a 
> dual AMD Opteron (in 64 bit mode).  
> There is an error message that occurs about twice a day at random times:
> 
> Sep 30 23:45:00 gideon kernel: bumps[12960]: segfault at 0000002a95611000 rip 0000000000402150 rsp 0000007fbffff1a8 error 6
> Oct  1 10:26:57 gideon kernel: bumps[13510]: segfault at 0000002a95611000 rip 0000000000402150 rsp 0000007fbffff1a8 error 6
> 
> As far as I can tell, there is no other effect than this message.
> (the system keeps running OK).
> 
> What is "bumps" ?

Some random program on your system. The x86-64 kernel logs all unhandled
segfaults by default. It is unlikely to be a kernel problem.

-Andi

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: segfault error on x86_64
  2003-10-03  8:20 ` segfault error on x86_64 Andi Kleen
@ 2003-10-03  8:44   ` Mitchell Blank Jr
  2003-10-03 10:04   ` bvds
  2003-10-04 14:13   ` insecure
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mitchell Blank Jr @ 2003-10-03  8:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: bvds, linux-kernel

Andi Kleen wrote:
> > What is "bumps" ?
> 
> Some random program on your system.

Specifically, it's one of the graphics demos that comes with xscreensaver.
If the segfault is reproducible on that arch you might want to report it
to jwz:
  http://www.jwz.org/xscreensaver/

-Mitch

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: segfault error on x86_64
  2003-10-03  8:20 ` segfault error on x86_64 Andi Kleen
  2003-10-03  8:44   ` Mitchell Blank Jr
@ 2003-10-03 10:04   ` bvds
  2003-10-04 14:13   ` insecure
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: bvds @ 2003-10-03 10:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ak; +Cc: linux-kernel

>> Sep 30 23:45:00 gideon kernel: bumps[12960]: segfault at 0000002a95611000 rip 0000000000402150 rsp 0000007fbffff1a8 error 6
>
>Some random program on your system. The x86-64 kernel logs all unhandled
>segfaults by default. It is unlikely to be a kernel problem.
>
>-Andi

So it doesn't have to be a kernel module of some kind?  
I have lm_sensors and comedi (data acquisition stuff) running,
which have modules inserted into the kernel.

BvdS

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: segfault error on x86_64
  2003-10-03  8:20 ` segfault error on x86_64 Andi Kleen
  2003-10-03  8:44   ` Mitchell Blank Jr
  2003-10-03 10:04   ` bvds
@ 2003-10-04 14:13   ` insecure
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: insecure @ 2003-10-04 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andi Kleen, bvds; +Cc: linux-kernel

On Friday 03 October 2003 11:20, Andi Kleen wrote:
> <bvds@bvds.geneva.edu> writes:
> > I have kernel 2.4.22 compiled with gcc 3.3 running on a
> > dual AMD Opteron (in 64 bit mode).
> > There is an error message that occurs about twice a day at random times:
> >
> > Sep 30 23:45:00 gideon kernel: bumps[12960]: segfault at 0000002a95611000
> > rip 0000000000402150 rsp 0000007fbffff1a8 error 6 Oct  1 10:26:57 gideon
> > kernel: bumps[13510]: segfault at 0000002a95611000 rip 0000000000402150
> > rsp 0000007fbffff1a8 error 6
> >
> > As far as I can tell, there is no other effect than this message.
> > (the system keeps running OK).
> >
> > What is "bumps" ?
>
> Some random program on your system. The x86-64 kernel logs all unhandled
> segfaults by default. It is unlikely to be a kernel problem.

Whoa. Do you mean it can be told to not do this?
This is very good, because it can now be generalized to all arches
without people objecting 'its legitimate to use unhandled SEGVs,
I do not want this logged' - they can turn it off in /proc.

Of course some folks will object anyway ;););)
-- 
vda

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-10-04 14:14 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20031002215345.A1D33E24D6@bvds.geneva.edu.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2003-10-03  8:20 ` segfault error on x86_64 Andi Kleen
2003-10-03  8:44   ` Mitchell Blank Jr
2003-10-03 10:04   ` bvds
2003-10-04 14:13   ` insecure
2003-10-02 21:53 bvds

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox