public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: dean gaudet <dean-list-linux-kernel@arctic.org>
Cc: Erlend Aasland <erlend-a@ux.his.no>,
	Steven French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>,
	James Morris <jmorris@intercode.com.au>,
	Samba Technical Mailing List <samba-technical@samba.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH CIFS] use CryptoAPI MD4/MD5
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 13:24:17 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031004182417.GC13573@waste.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0310041058000.5954@twinlark.arctic.org>

On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 11:00:01AM -0700, dean gaudet wrote:
> what about CryptoAPI is so expensive that you can't use a stack-based
> context?

The alloc functions hide a bunch of module lookup details and the size
of the context structures vary from one alg to the next. They also
tend to hide block-sized buffers to deal with fragments. So it's a
little ugly but not insurmountable.

> this seems pretty dumb converting a stack-based md5 context to multiple
> instances in multiple structures.
> 
> the stack is almost guaranteed to be in L1 cache.
> 
> multiplying that structure by N connections is just a waste of memory
> bandwidth.  not to mention the locking crud you seem to need to do... the
> stack is implicitly locked.
> 
> is CryptoAPI really this broken?

It's a bit inflexible in this regard, yes.

-- 
Matt Mackall : http://www.selenic.com : of or relating to the moon

  reply	other threads:[~2003-10-04 18:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <OF9C1504BB.5FB00D5A-ON87256DB3.0015672E-86256DB3.001798AE@us.ibm.com>
2003-10-02 11:37 ` [PATCH CIFS] use CryptoAPI MD4/MD5 Erlend Aasland
2003-10-04 18:00   ` dean gaudet
2003-10-04 18:24     ` Matt Mackall [this message]
2003-10-04 18:51       ` dean gaudet
2003-10-04 20:08         ` Francois Romieu
2003-10-05  0:08         ` Matt Mackall
2003-10-05 12:29         ` Erlend Aasland
2003-09-02 20:30 [RFC][PATCH] 2nd try to convert cifs to use CryptoAPI Erlend Aasland
2003-10-01 13:30 ` [PATCH CIFS] use CryptoAPI MD4/MD5 Erlend Aasland
2003-10-01 19:55   ` Matt Mackall
2003-10-01 23:26     ` Erlend Aasland
2003-10-01 23:42       ` Matt Mackall
2003-10-01 23:52         ` Erlend Aasland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031004182417.GC13573@waste.org \
    --to=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=dean-list-linux-kernel@arctic.org \
    --cc=erlend-a@ux.his.no \
    --cc=jmorris@intercode.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=samba-technical@samba.org \
    --cc=sfrench@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox