From: Patrick Mansfield <patmans@us.ibm.com>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: oops when removing sbp2 module
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 07:49:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031005074902.A26284@beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16256.6322.388402.857084@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>; from paulus@samba.org on Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 11:12:18PM +1000
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 11:12:18PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> In fact what is happening is that class_device_unregister gets called
> twice for the same classdev. This is because scsi_remove_device gets
> called twice for the same device. The first time, the call chain
> looks like this:
>
> scsi_remove_device
> sbp2_remove_device
> sbp2_remove
> device_release_driver
> driver_detach
> bus_remove_driver
> driver_unregister
> hpsb_unregister_protocol
> sbp2_module_exit
>
> and the second time it looks like this:
>
> scsi_remove_device
> scsi_forget_host
> scsi_remove_host
> sbp2_remove_host
> hpsb_unregister_highlevel
> sbp2_module_exit
>
> So, is this a reference counting problem on the classdev, a problem
> where the scsi layer doesn't remove the scsi device from its internal
> lists properly in scsi_remove_device, or a problem in the sbp2 code?
> Anyone got a fix?
>
> Thanks,
> Paul.
Paul -
There is a typo on a change to the access_count check.
Try this patch:
--- bleed-2.5/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c-orig Mon Sep 29 12:21:09 2003
+++ bleed-2.5/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c Mon Sep 29 16:19:22 2003
@@ -412,7 +412,7 @@
set_bit(SDEV_DEL, &sdev->sdev_state);
if (sdev->host->hostt->slave_destroy)
sdev->host->hostt->slave_destroy(sdev);
- if (atomic_read(&sdev->access_count))
+ if (!atomic_read(&sdev->access_count))
device_del(&sdev->sdev_gendev);
up_write(&class->subsys.rwsem);
}
-- Patrick Mansfield
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-05 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-05 13:12 oops when removing sbp2 module Paul Mackerras
2003-10-05 14:49 ` Patrick Mansfield [this message]
2003-10-06 3:08 ` Paul Mackerras
2003-10-06 3:36 ` Patrick Mansfield
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031005074902.A26284@beaverton.ibm.com \
--to=patmans@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox