public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Benedyczak <golbi@mat.uni.torun.pl>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>,
	pwaechtler@mac.com, Michal Wronski <wrona@mat.uni.torun.pl>
Subject: Re: POSIX message queues
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 19:16:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031005181630.GA26958@mail.shareable.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F80484A.3030105@redhat.com>

Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> > In another words: is our implementation in the position
> > of NGPT or better? ;-)
> 
> I don't understand.  Why NGPT and what about "position"?

He is asking if the work will be wasted effort that is dismissed or
superceded, like NGPT was.

> If you mean
> including a solution in the runtime (librt), sure, this will happen.
> But not before I see a solution in the official kernel.

Speaking of librt - I should not have to link in pthreads and the
run-time overhead associated with it (locking stdio etc.) just so I
can use shm_open().  Any chance of fixing this?

-- Jamie

  reply	other threads:[~2003-10-05 18:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-05  9:13 POSIX message queues Krzysztof Benedyczak
2003-10-05 10:11 ` Manfred Spraul
2003-10-06 19:04   ` Krzysztof Benedyczak
2003-10-05 16:35 ` Ulrich Drepper
2003-10-05 18:16   ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
2003-10-05 18:32     ` Jakub Jelinek
2003-10-05 19:18       ` Jamie Lokier
2003-10-05 21:52         ` Ulrich Drepper
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-07  7:50 Peter Waechtler
2003-10-07  8:11 ` Jakub Jelinek
2002-10-02 10:35 Krzysztof Benedyczak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031005181630.GA26958@mail.shareable.org \
    --to=jamie@shareable.org \
    --cc=drepper@redhat.com \
    --cc=golbi@mat.uni.torun.pl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
    --cc=pwaechtler@mac.com \
    --cc=wrona@mat.uni.torun.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox