public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 71MB compressed for COMPILED(!!!) 2.6.0-test6
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 01:38:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031006083803.GB1135@matchmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1065428996.5033.5.camel@laptop.fenrus.com>

On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 10:29:56AM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 10:23, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> > Hi LK,
> > 
> > A while back (after 2.6.0-test2-mm1 which came to 6.4MB compressed, and
> > 2.6.0-test3-mm2 which came out to 34MB compressed), I noticed that the file
> > sizes for compiled object code got a lot bigger.  I reported it at the time,
> > but nobody was interested.
> > 
> > Today after using 2.6.0-test4-mm3 for a few weeks, I decided to upgrade to
> > test6 and it's up to 71MB compressed!
> 
> 
> CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y
> 
> makes the kernel be compiled with -g which gives it debuginfo, which
> basically ends up being the entire sourcecode included in the
> modules/kernel
> 

Thanks Arjan.

config DEBUG_INFO
	bool "Compile the kernel with debug info"
	depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
	help
          If you say Y here the resulting kernel image will include
	  debugging info resulting in a larger kernel image.
	  Say Y here only if you plan to use gdb to debug the kernel.
	  If you don't debug the kernel, you can say N.

"Larger kernel image" yeah, NO SHIT! ;)

Maybe something that says it may enlarge your kernel by 5-10 times would be
nice...

  reply	other threads:[~2003-10-06  8:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-06  8:23 71MB compressed for COMPILED(!!!) 2.6.0-test6 Mike Fedyk
2003-10-06  8:29 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-10-06  8:38   ` Mike Fedyk [this message]
2003-10-06 10:24     ` Matthias Andree
2003-10-06 15:24       ` Jesper Juhl
2003-10-06 17:40         ` Mike Fedyk
2003-10-07  2:25           ` Matt Mackall
2003-10-06 17:46         ` jdow
2003-10-06 23:37           ` jw schultz
2003-10-07 20:31             ` Jesper Juhl
2003-10-07 21:31               ` Arthur Othieno
2003-10-06  9:05 ` Solved! was: " Mike Fedyk
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-06  8:49 Boszormenyi Zoltan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031006083803.GB1135@matchmail.com \
    --to=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
    --cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox