Re: [RFC 0/6] Backing Store for sysfs

[Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>]

On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 09:01:40PM +0200, Pascal Schmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Oct 2003 20:20:16 +0200, you wrote in linux.kernel:
> 
> > Does that make more sense?  We can't just look at what happens with this
> > patch without actually accessing all of the sysfs tree, as that will be
> > the "normal" case.
> 
> Well, the normal case for me and other people not using any hot-pluggable
> devices will be to run a hotplug agent that does absolutely nothing... so
> in my case, the proposed patch would help - more memory available for the
> normal work I do.
> 
> With a static /dev and no hotpluggable stuff around, there is no need
> for and hotplug agent being there at all. And I do think such system
> are not too uncommon, so considering them would probably be nice.

Systems like this are not uncommon, I agree.  But also for systems like
this, the current code works just fine (small number of fixed devices.)
I haven't heard anyone complain about memory usage for a normal system
(99.9% of the systems out there.)

Also,  remember that in 2.7 I'm going to make device numbers random so
you will have to use something like udev to control your /dev tree.
Slowly weaning yourself off of a static /dev during the next 2 years or
so might be a good idea :)

thanks,

greg k-h