From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262546AbTJGRtl (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Oct 2003 13:49:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262551AbTJGRtl (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Oct 2003 13:49:41 -0400 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([65.200.24.183]:59113 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262546AbTJGRtk (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Oct 2003 13:49:40 -0400 Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 10:49:28 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Hugo Mills , Andreas Jellinghaus , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: devfs vs. udev Message-ID: <20031007174928.GB1956@kroah.com> Reply-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20031007142349.GX1223@rdlg.net> <20031007165404.GB29870@carfax.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031007165404.GB29870@carfax.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 05:54:04PM +0100, Hugo Mills wrote: > > Surely udev needs the ability to make more than one device node or > symlink when a device is plugged in anyway, so I just see this as an > issue of writing the appropriate default configuration files. More than one device node per device? Why would you want that? And sure, it's just software, it can be made to do that, if someone sends me a patch... :) thanks, greg k-h