From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S262554AbTJGRyW (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Tue, 7 Oct 2003 13:54:22 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262555AbTJGRyV
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 7 Oct 2003 13:54:21 -0400
Received: from mail.kroah.org ([65.200.24.183]:17131 "EHLO perch.kroah.org")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262554AbTJGRyU (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 7 Oct 2003 13:54:20 -0400
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 10:54:09 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Andreas Jellinghaus <aj@dungeon.inka.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: devfs vs. udev
Message-ID: <20031007175409.GD1956@kroah.com>
Reply-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <yw1xad8dfcjg.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <pan.2003.10.07.13.41.23.48967@dungeon.inka.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <pan.2003.10.07.13.41.23.48967@dungeon.inka.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 03:41:24PM +0200, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> 
> maybe someone wants to remove the text about devfs being obsolete
> till udev is actually ready for use?

Why?  devfs is still obsolete no matter if udev is "production ready" or
not :)

thanks,

greg k-h