From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261507AbTJHUcB (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Oct 2003 16:32:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261774AbTJHUcA (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Oct 2003 16:32:00 -0400 Received: from natsmtp01.rzone.de ([81.169.145.166]:5352 "EHLO natsmtp01.rzone.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261507AbTJHUb6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Oct 2003 16:31:58 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [PATCH] cleanup of compat_ioctl functions Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 22:26:15 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200310081809.42859.arnd@arndb.de> <20031008192929.GC1035@elf.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20031008192929.GC1035@elf.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200310082226.15104.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 08 October 2003 21:29, Pavel Machek wrote: > Also __u32 should not be used here, it looks too ugly and u32 is > okay. Same for __u16 and __u64. Its simple search&replace, and as you > are doing lots of changes, anyway.... Well, in the light of 'strictly bug fixes only', it was probably too much search&replace already. I guess I'll have to prepare a new patch that just fixes the bugs in the current s390 compat_ioctl code and not use fs/compat_ioctl.c in 2.6.0. Arnd <><