From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262407AbTJJHCf (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2003 03:02:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262547AbTJJHCf (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2003 03:02:35 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:63457 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262407AbTJJHCe (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2003 03:02:34 -0400 Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 23:56:53 -0700 From: "David S. Miller" To: David Gibson Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, trivial@rustcorp.com.au Subject: Re: [TRIVIAL] Fix initialization sequence in SunGEM driver Message-Id: <20031009235653.26e509c1.davem@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20031009070649.GA830@zax> References: <20031009070649.GA830@zax> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.2 (GTK+ 1.2.6; sparc-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Applied, thanks David. But in the future please send net driver fixes to netdev@oss.sgi.com with either Jeff Garzik or myself CC:'d? Thanks. I also would absolutely not classify your patch as "trivial". It's not like a missing semi-colon or a comment typo, someone with real understanding of how this stuff works would need to review this patch. Based just upon the kinds of networking patches Linus has forwarded to me today, I can duly say that far too much stuff is being sent as "[TRIVIAL]" which is not.