From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262555AbTJJIBH (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2003 04:01:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262574AbTJJIBH (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2003 04:01:07 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:8647 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262555AbTJJIBF (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2003 04:01:05 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:01:00 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: "Frederick, Fabian" Cc: "Linux-Kernel (E-mail)" Subject: Re: [2.7 "thoughts"] V0.3 Message-ID: <20031010080100.GO1232@suse.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 10 2003, Frederick, Fabian wrote: > 2.7 "thoughts" > Thanks to Gabor, Stuart, Stephan and others > Don't hesitate to send me more or comment. Please, do we really have to look at this from now and until 2.7 opens? If I see more nice "features" from people that are never going to write them anyways, I think I'll scream. > * Software RAID 0+1 perhaps? > A lot of hardware RAID cards support it, why not the > kernel? By RAID 0+1 I mean mirror-RAIDing two (or more) > stripe-RAID arrays. (Or can this be done already?) What's wrong with raid X on top of raid Y? IOW, this works perfectly fine since, hang on, 2.2 + new raid. -- Jens Axboe