From: Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.de>
To: Kevin Corry <kevcorry@us.ibm.com>,
Stuart Longland <stuartl@longlandclan.hopto.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.7 thoughts
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 20:29:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031010182918.GF1084@marowsky-bree.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200310100830.03216.kevcorry@us.ibm.com>
On 2003-10-10T08:30:03,
Kevin Corry <kevcorry@us.ibm.com> said:
> On Friday 10 October 2003 01:19, Stuart Longland wrote:
> > - Software RAID 0+1 perhaps?
Because RAID 0+1 is a rather bad idea. You want RAID 1+0. Make up the
fault matrix and simulate what happens if drives fail.
We can do both though, as Kevin pointed out. So if you want to shot
yourself in the foot, in the best Unix tradition, we allow you to ;)
I'd suggest moving this to the linux-raid list though.
Sincerely,
Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@suse.de>
--
High Availability & Clustering ever tried. ever failed. no matter.
SuSE Labs try again. fail again. fail better.
Research & Development, SUSE LINUX AG -- Samuel Beckett
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-10 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-09 8:08 2.7 thoughts Frederick, Fabian
2003-10-09 8:55 ` John Bradford
2003-10-09 9:45 ` mario noioso
2003-10-09 11:58 ` Gábor Lénárt
2003-10-09 14:57 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-10-10 6:19 ` Stuart Longland
2003-10-10 6:30 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-10-10 7:30 ` YoshiyaETO
2003-10-10 7:40 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-10-10 8:47 ` YoshiyaETO
2003-10-10 9:09 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-10-10 10:26 ` YoshiyaETO
2003-10-10 10:50 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-10-10 10:55 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-10-10 10:51 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-10-10 14:07 ` Stuart Longland
2003-10-10 14:27 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-10-10 14:35 ` Gábor Lénárt
2003-10-10 14:47 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-10-10 14:48 ` Mark Mielke
2003-10-10 15:01 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-10-10 15:50 ` Mark Mielke
2003-10-10 16:35 ` Chris Friesen
2003-10-10 16:44 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-10-12 20:14 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-10 15:12 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-10-10 15:21 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-10-10 18:03 ` Tim Hockin
2003-10-10 18:29 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-10-10 18:56 ` Tim Hockin
2003-10-10 23:40 ` Rusty Russell
2003-10-15 19:15 ` Anton Blanchard
2003-10-10 13:30 ` Kevin Corry
2003-10-10 18:29 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree [this message]
2003-10-11 3:49 ` jw schultz
2003-10-11 13:24 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2003-10-11 19:50 ` jw schultz
2003-10-10 17:12 ` Matt Simonsen
2003-10-10 20:59 ` Pedro Larroy
2003-10-09 18:17 ` Greg KH
2003-10-09 19:07 ` Pavel Machek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-09 11:56 Svetoslav Slavtchev
2003-10-09 12:44 Xose Vazquez Perez
2003-10-09 13:17 Frederick, Fabian
2003-10-09 13:19 ` Jens Axboe
2003-10-09 13:50 ` Gábor Lénárt
2003-10-09 13:52 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-10-10 19:01 Zwane Mwaikambo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031010182918.GF1084@marowsky-bree.de \
--to=lmb@suse.de \
--cc=kevcorry@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stuartl@longlandclan.hopto.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox