From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262695AbTJJScF (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2003 14:32:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263125AbTJJScF (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2003 14:32:05 -0400 Received: from gate.in-addr.de ([212.8.193.158]:33769 "EHLO mx.in-addr.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262695AbTJJScC (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2003 14:32:02 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 20:29:18 +0200 From: Lars Marowsky-Bree To: Kevin Corry , Stuart Longland Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.7 thoughts Message-ID: <20031010182918.GF1084@marowsky-bree.de> References: <20031009165723.43ae9cb5.skraw@ithnet.com> <3F864F82.4050509@longlandclan.hopto.org> <200310100830.03216.kevcorry@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200310100830.03216.kevcorry@us.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Ctuhulu: HASTUR Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2003-10-10T08:30:03, Kevin Corry said: > On Friday 10 October 2003 01:19, Stuart Longland wrote: > > - Software RAID 0+1 perhaps? Because RAID 0+1 is a rather bad idea. You want RAID 1+0. Make up the fault matrix and simulate what happens if drives fail. We can do both though, as Kevin pointed out. So if you want to shot yourself in the foot, in the best Unix tradition, we allow you to ;) I'd suggest moving this to the linux-raid list though. Sincerely, Lars Marowsky-Brée -- High Availability & Clustering ever tried. ever failed. no matter. SuSE Labs try again. fail again. fail better. Research & Development, SUSE LINUX AG -- Samuel Beckett