From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261427AbTJJSm7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2003 14:42:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262725AbTJJSm7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2003 14:42:59 -0400 Received: from pix-525-pool.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:60868 "EHLO lacrosse.corp.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261427AbTJJSm6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2003 14:42:58 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 19:42:41 +0100 From: Dave Jones To: Jurgen Kramer Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6.0-test7] cpufreq longhaul trouble Message-ID: <20031010184241.GC32600@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Jurgen Kramer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1065784536.2071.3.camel@paragon.slim> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1065784536.2071.3.camel@paragon.slim> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 01:15:37PM +0200, Jurgen Kramer wrote: > It seems that longhaul support in 2.6.0-test7 is still not working > properly...:-(. > > longhaul: VIA C3 'Ezra' [C5C] CPU detected. Longhaul v2 supported. > longhaul: Bogus values Min:0.000 Max:0.000. Voltage scaling disabled. > longhaul: MinMult=5.0x MaxMult=6.0x > longhaul: FSB: 0MHz Lowestspeed=0MHz Highestspeed=0MHz Oh boy, this is a real egg-on-face bug if I'm right.. edit arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/longhaul.c and change line 394 to read longhaul_version = 1; I suspect things will suddenly start making a lot more sense. Dave -- Dave Jones http://www.codemonkey.org.uk