From: Willy TARREAU <willy@w.ods.org>
To: Stephen Satchell <list@fluent2.pyramid.net>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org,
kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org
Subject: Re: Job Announcements (was Linux TCP/IP Stack Developer)
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 23:29:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031011212936.GA15198@pcw.home.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.0.20031011130522.011e97b0@fluent2.pyramid.net>
Hello !
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 01:25:08PM -0700, Stephen Satchell wrote:
> What makes you believe that all 30,000+ readers of LKML would not welcome
> short, tasteful, single-shot announcements of such development positions?
> Particularly if the announcement was for work within moving distance of
> where a reader lives?
I'm certain you're right at this point, ie there may be *some* people here
interested by an occasional advertisement, while most others see these mails
as other junk that sometimes filter through David's filters.
The problem is that advertising for job offering costs *a lot* to companies,
particularly when high level profiles are needed (can be up several months of
the employee's fee). Considering this, if nobody does the unpleasant police
work here, more and more companies will attempt their chance to catch someone
for free here, being unfair to other regular ones, and annoying all of us
several times a day. And I'm not counting all the companies which send fake
offerings just to get some free ads for their products (we've already seen
some here).
So the only way to prevent this from happening, is to forbid them to do it,
even if some people may miss one good opportunity. There are sites for this,
even newsgroups, so it clearly doesn't have its place here. I'm sure David
also has a lot of other reasons for this, but I sincerely think that the ones
I exposed here are already good justifications by themselves
Regards,
Willy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-11 21:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-10 22:55 Linux TCP/IP Stack Developer hotjobs
2003-10-11 17:58 ` David S. Miller
2003-10-11 20:25 ` Job Announcements (was Linux TCP/IP Stack Developer) Stephen Satchell
2003-10-11 20:35 ` David S. Miller
2003-10-11 22:12 ` jdow
2003-10-11 22:11 ` David S. Miller
2003-10-11 21:29 ` Willy TARREAU [this message]
2003-10-11 22:16 ` Stephen Satchell
2003-10-11 23:39 ` Mark Mielke
2003-10-12 11:03 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-10-12 14:59 ` Stephen Satchell
2003-10-13 1:47 ` Adam Sulmicki
2003-10-13 1:58 ` Adam Sulmicki
2003-10-14 9:23 ` Jamie Lokier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031011212936.GA15198@pcw.home.local \
--to=willy@w.ods.org \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=list@fluent2.pyramid.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox