public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <gilbertd@treblig.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Software RAID5 with 2.6.0-test
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 12:50:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031018115049.GB760@gallifrey> (raw)

Hi,
  First off, I am never going to try building a software IDE RAID 5
on Linux again in an important production system - my experience
says that it just isn't possible to get that many IDE channels
to work together reliably.  I know there are some people who
have managed it, and I did hear there was a race condition
and a patch to fix it - but in the end in a production system
with a serious size of RAID throwing in a 3-ware or similar
is a hell of a lot simpler and just works.

  As for speed; well I'm not sure.  I think the comparisons of
100MHz processors vs the speed of your xeon are bogus.  I would
hope at least some of the work on the hardware raid controllers
is done in hardware (XORing blocks of data isn't exactly hard
in hardware), and in addition the amount of CPU used is going
to be limited by memory bandwidth (and associated cache pollution?)
before the clock rate of the processor gets involved I would
have thought.

  I'd love to see some real benchmarks to prove me wrong however!

Dave

 -----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code -------   
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert    | Running GNU/Linux on Alpha,68K| Happy  \ 
\ gro.gilbert @ treblig.org | MIPS,x86,ARM,SPARC,PPC & HPPA | In Hex /
 \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org   |_______/

             reply	other threads:[~2003-10-18 11:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-18 11:50 Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2003-10-21 21:51 ` Software RAID5 with 2.6.0-test bill davidsen
2003-10-22  2:37   ` jw schultz
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-08 22:43 Måns Rullgård
2003-10-08 23:24 ` Torrey Hoffman
2003-10-08 23:44   ` Måns Rullgård
2003-10-09  0:51     ` Andre Tomt
2003-10-09  8:55       ` Måns Rullgård
2003-10-09  9:10         ` Andre Tomt
2003-10-09  9:28           ` Måns Rullgård
2003-10-17 17:07           ` Bill Davidsen
2003-10-17 17:44             ` Måns Rullgård
2003-10-17 18:39               ` Samuel Flory
2003-10-17 19:18                 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-10-17 19:37                   ` Jakob Oestergaard
2003-10-17 19:52                     ` Måns Rullgård
2003-10-18 22:55                   ` jw schultz
2003-10-17 19:24               ` Jakob Oestergaard
2003-10-19  9:25                 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-21 21:44                 ` bill davidsen
2003-10-21 21:36               ` bill davidsen
2003-10-22 15:17                 ` Chuck Campbell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031018115049.GB760@gallifrey \
    --to=gilbertd@treblig.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox