From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262002AbTJSHWZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Oct 2003 03:22:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262034AbTJSHWZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Oct 2003 03:22:25 -0400 Received: from d216-232-206-119.bchsia.telus.net ([216.232.206.119]:4612 "EHLO cyclops.implode.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262002AbTJSHWX (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Oct 2003 03:22:23 -0400 Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 00:22:18 -0700 From: John Wong To: Linux Kernel Subject: Re: via-rhine on 2.4.23-pre6 Too much work at interrupt, status=0x00001000. (fwd) Message-ID: <20031019072218.GA14146@gambit.implode.net> References: <3F90687E.8030601@pobox.com> <20031019060953.GA1663@gambit.implode.net> <20031019071012.GA13898@gambit.implode.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031019071012.GA13898@gambit.implode.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Reposting to the LKML as my previous post had a technical difficulty. John On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 12:10:12AM -0700, John Wong wrote: > I received the same problem with 2.4.23-pre2. Just to amuse myself, I > booted up 2.4.22 and the problem of Too much work still occurs. > > John > > On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 11:09:53PM -0700, John Wong wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I took a slightly different route, and updated the kernel to 2.4.23-pre7 > > and disabled ACPI. The problem did reoccur, so this would rule out > > ACPI. I will downgrade the kernel to pre2 now. > > > > Oct 18 21:46:58 cyclops kernel: eth0: Too much work at interrupt, > > status=0x00001000. > > > > John > > > > On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 06:09:02PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > >Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:27:17 -0700 > > > >From: John Wong > > > >To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > >Subject: via-rhine on 2.4.23-pre6 Too much work at interrupt, > > > > status=0x00001000. > > > > > > > >The system used to run 2.4.22 and did not have this too much work > > > >problem. There were some other hardware changes. The system used to be > > > >a Pentium 100 on a Triton 430FX chipset Intel Advanced/EV board. Now it > > > >is a K6 2 - 500 on a Via Apollo MVP3 chipset on FIC VA-503+ board. > > > >The NIC stayed the same. The kernel was recompiled and ACPI was > > > >enabled. > > > > > > > >I noticed in 2.4.23-pre2 -> pre3 > > > > [netdrvr] sync with 2.5: epic100, fealnx, via-rhine, winbond-840 > > > > > > > > > This cset contains no functional via-rhine changes... First thing to do > > > would be try to 2.4.23-pre2. But my main suspect would be ACPI. > > > > > > Jeff > > > > > > > > >