From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261639AbTJSNyk (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Oct 2003 09:54:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261664AbTJSNyj (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Oct 2003 09:54:39 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:19460 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261639AbTJSNyi (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Oct 2003 09:54:38 -0400 Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 14:54:29 +0100 From: Dave Jones To: Jurgen Kramer Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test8: cpufreq longhaul probs..still :-( Message-ID: <20031019135429.GA8924@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Jurgen Kramer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1066475780.2607.6.camel@paragon.slim> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1066475780.2607.6.camel@paragon.slim> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 01:16:21PM +0200, Jurgen Kramer wrote: > With test8 there are still problems with the longhaul cpufreq stuff: > > longhaul: VIA C3 'Ezra' [C5C] CPU detected. Longhaul v1 supported. > longhaul: MinMult=3.0x MaxMult=6.0x > longhaul: FSB: 0MHz Lowestspeed=0MHz Highestspeed=0MHz *boggle*, we had these fixed I thought.. I'm going to need you to litter the code with printk's to find out why your MSRs are returning zeros. Contact me off list if you want a patch to do this, otherwise.. don't be afraid to go overboard, the more debug info the better. > I'll check if I can fix the min/max freq. Is Longhaul v1 correct for > this CPU? With cpufreq from 2.4 it always displays v2. According to the documentation, yes. Dave -- Dave Jones http://www.codemonkey.org.uk