public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Torben Mathiasen <torben.mathiasen@hp.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>
Cc: Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>,
	Torben Mathiasen <torben.mathiasen@hp.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFT][PATCH] fix ServerWorks PIO auto-tuning
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 11:24:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031020092445.GB1685@tmathiasen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200310181745.41768.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl>

On Sat, Oct 18 2003, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> 
> We depend on BIOS hints for ServerWorks and BIOS is not enabling DMA.
> AFAIR we can't force DMA in this case because there are broken hardware
> designs, so current behavior is safe.  However more research is needed...
>

On a Proliant, DMA may or may not be supported on different devices, and the
BIOS knows about it. So by letting it hint its setup, we have a safe way of
configuring the chipset. The 'biostimings' code used a similar approach (by
leaving the BIOS setup timings alone), but as you also reported, was so generic
that it could be dangerous for other chipsets.

So if you have a Proliant where you get DMA enabled and it fails, it has to be
a BIOS bug (since the BIOS hintet DMA), and I'd like to know about it. OTOH, if
you have to explicitly enable DMA using hdparm, it may not be supported (since
the BIOS hinted pio). 


BTW Tomas, that drive you're adding to your ML350G2, is that just to have a spare IDE
disk drive? IIRC, the 350 is a SCSI system with only an ATAPI cdrom drive. But
I could be wrong.

Thanks,
Torben

  reply	other threads:[~2003-10-20  9:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-16 21:44 [RFT][PATCH] fix ServerWorks PIO auto-tuning Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-10-17  7:37 ` Tomas Szepe
2003-10-17  9:30   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-10-17  9:51 ` Torben Mathiasen
2003-10-17 10:22   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-10-17 10:20     ` Torben Mathiasen
2003-10-17 10:23   ` Tomas Szepe
2003-10-18 13:02 ` Tomas Szepe
2003-10-18 15:45   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-10-20  9:24     ` Torben Mathiasen [this message]
2003-10-20 10:44       ` Tomas Szepe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031020092445.GB1685@tmathiasen \
    --to=torben.mathiasen@hp.com \
    --cc=B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=szepe@pinerecords.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox