From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262591AbTJTOs0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2003 10:48:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262592AbTJTOs0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2003 10:48:26 -0400 Received: from [62.67.222.139] ([62.67.222.139]:47562 "EHLO mail.ku-gbr.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262591AbTJTOsY (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2003 10:48:24 -0400 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 16:48:22 +0200 From: Konstantin Kletschke To: Lionel Bouton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Uncorrectable Error on IDE, significant accumulation Message-ID: <20031020144822.GA593@synertronixx3> Reply-To: konsti@ludenkalle.de References: <20031020132705.GA1171@synertronixx3> <3F93E728.5050908@inet6.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F93E728.5050908@inet6.fr> X-PGP-Key: http://www.ludenkalle.de/konsti/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 03:46:16PM +0200, Lionel Bouton wrote: > > When did you purchase it ? Better : can you find the revision (black on IIRC it is revision 3 or older. IIRC I downloaded BIOS files for revision 3.x or older, 1.3? > There were electrical defects with the earliest K7S5A revisions (I > returned one myself). Rev 0, 1, 2 and 3 are affected, I don't remember > for 4-6 but IIRC rev 7 and above aren't affected : I have a rev 5 or 7 > at home (don't remember which one it is) and it works perfectly. Hm, I have the Board Revision whih also remembers its BIOS Settings once after a while (once per month or so). Does that also belong to "electrical defects"? So should I buy a K7S5A Pro now. It eats my old school SDRAM, thats why... Konsti -- 2.6.0-test1-mm2 Konstantin Kletschke , GPG KeyID EF62FCEF Fingerprint: 13C9 B16B 9844 EC15 CC2E A080 1E69 3FDA EF62 FCEF keulator.homelinux.org up 27 min,