From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262888AbTJUDAk (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2003 23:00:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262884AbTJUC7h (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2003 22:59:37 -0400 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([65.200.24.183]:62879 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262859AbTJUC5k (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Oct 2003 22:57:40 -0400 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 19:43:22 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Martin Schlemmer Cc: clemens@dwf.com, linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, KML , reg@orion.dwf.com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] udev 003 release Message-ID: <20031021024322.GA29643@kroah.com> References: <20031017055652.GA7712@kroah.com> <200310171757.h9HHvGiY006997@orion.dwf.com> <20031017181923.GA10649@kroah.com> <20031017182754.GA10714@kroah.com> <1066696767.10221.164.camel@nosferatu.lan> <20031021005025.GA28269@kroah.com> <1066698679.10221.178.camel@nosferatu.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1066698679.10221.178.camel@nosferatu.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 03:11:19AM +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > On Tue, 2003-10-21 at 02:50, Greg KH wrote: > > > 1) Is it possible to maintain naming of tarball/version ? Meaning, > > > say we forget about the 003 version, could the next be 0.4, or even > > > 0.3.1 or whatever ? Just changing makes trying to keep packages > > > sane a hassle. Thanks :) > > > > The naming will be consistant from now on. Next release will be 004, > > followed by 005, and so on. Remember, version numbers mean nothing :) > > > > Well, if you had an 0.2 already, 003 sorda comes and screw the pooch > (if trying to work with a package manager - although it seems we are > OK with ours seeing 003 as the later) :) Exactly, switching this early is fine by all of the package managers I've looked at. Does this mean you have a udev gentoo package somewhere? > > Of course you need a kernel patch for the sound class that is only > > available in my kernel tree right now for sound devices to work with > > udev... > > > > Need help testing ? :) (Yes, I am a lazy bastard, and a patch against > test8 would help if you needed the testing) I need to get these class patches out sometime soon, been too busy lately... greg k-h