From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263270AbTJVI4O (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2003 04:56:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263212AbTJVI4O (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2003 04:56:14 -0400 Received: from pa208.myslowice.sdi.tpnet.pl ([213.76.228.208]:4736 "EHLO finwe.eu.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263270AbTJVI4N (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2003 04:56:13 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 10:56:11 +0200 From: Jacek Kawa To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test8, oops, [__remove_from_page_cache+36/112] __remove_from_page_cache+0x24/0x70 Message-ID: <20031022085611.GA1848@finwe.eu.org> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20031022084413.GA2773@finwe.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20031022084413.GA2773@finwe.eu.org> Organization: Kreatorzy Kreacji Bialej User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jak podają anonimowe źródła, przepowiedziano, że Jacek Kawa napisze: > This machine has new RAM, but after about 7 hours of testing, > memtest.86 didn't show any errors... Well, it's RAM anyway... I've just got few segfaults in vim... bye -- Jacek Kawa