* Re: via-rhine on 2.4.23-pre6 Too much work at interrupt, status=0x00001000. (fwd)
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0310171852330.12627-100000@logos.cnet>
@ 2003-10-17 22:09 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-10-19 6:09 ` John Wong
2003-10-23 4:23 ` John Wong
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2003-10-17 22:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Wong; +Cc: Marcelo Tosatti, Linux Kernel
> Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:27:17 -0700
> From: John Wong <kernel@implode.net>
> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: via-rhine on 2.4.23-pre6 Too much work at interrupt,
> status=0x00001000.
>
> The system used to run 2.4.22 and did not have this too much work
> problem. There were some other hardware changes. The system used to be
> a Pentium 100 on a Triton 430FX chipset Intel Advanced/EV board. Now it
> is a K6 2 - 500 on a Via Apollo MVP3 chipset on FIC VA-503+ board.
> The NIC stayed the same. The kernel was recompiled and ACPI was
> enabled.
>
> I noticed in 2.4.23-pre2 -> pre3
> [netdrvr] sync with 2.5: epic100, fealnx, via-rhine, winbond-840
This cset contains no functional via-rhine changes... First thing to do
would be try to 2.4.23-pre2. But my main suspect would be ACPI.
Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: via-rhine on 2.4.23-pre6 Too much work at interrupt, status=0x00001000. (fwd)
2003-10-17 22:09 ` via-rhine on 2.4.23-pre6 Too much work at interrupt, status=0x00001000. (fwd) Jeff Garzik
@ 2003-10-19 6:09 ` John Wong
[not found] ` <20031019071012.GA13898@gambit.implode.net>
2003-10-23 4:23 ` John Wong
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: John Wong @ 2003-10-19 6:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: Marcelo Tosatti, Linux Kernel
Hi,
I took a slightly different route, and updated the kernel to 2.4.23-pre7
and disabled ACPI. The problem did reoccur, so this would rule out
ACPI. I will downgrade the kernel to pre2 now.
Oct 18 21:46:58 cyclops kernel: eth0: Too much work at interrupt,
status=0x00001000.
John
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 06:09:02PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:27:17 -0700
> >From: John Wong <kernel@implode.net>
> >To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> >Subject: via-rhine on 2.4.23-pre6 Too much work at interrupt,
> > status=0x00001000.
> >
> >The system used to run 2.4.22 and did not have this too much work
> >problem. There were some other hardware changes. The system used to be
> >a Pentium 100 on a Triton 430FX chipset Intel Advanced/EV board. Now it
> >is a K6 2 - 500 on a Via Apollo MVP3 chipset on FIC VA-503+ board.
> >The NIC stayed the same. The kernel was recompiled and ACPI was
> >enabled.
> >
> >I noticed in 2.4.23-pre2 -> pre3
> > [netdrvr] sync with 2.5: epic100, fealnx, via-rhine, winbond-840
>
>
> This cset contains no functional via-rhine changes... First thing to do
> would be try to 2.4.23-pre2. But my main suspect would be ACPI.
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: via-rhine on 2.4.23-pre6 Too much work at interrupt, status=0x00001000. (fwd)
[not found] ` <20031019071012.GA13898@gambit.implode.net>
@ 2003-10-19 7:22 ` John Wong
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: John Wong @ 2003-10-19 7:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel
Reposting to the LKML as my previous post had a technical difficulty.
John
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 12:10:12AM -0700, John Wong wrote:
> I received the same problem with 2.4.23-pre2. Just to amuse myself, I
> booted up 2.4.22 and the problem of Too much work still occurs.
>
> John
>
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 11:09:53PM -0700, John Wong wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I took a slightly different route, and updated the kernel to 2.4.23-pre7
> > and disabled ACPI. The problem did reoccur, so this would rule out
> > ACPI. I will downgrade the kernel to pre2 now.
> >
> > Oct 18 21:46:58 cyclops kernel: eth0: Too much work at interrupt,
> > status=0x00001000.
> >
> > John
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 06:09:02PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > >Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:27:17 -0700
> > > >From: John Wong <kernel@implode.net>
> > > >To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > > >Subject: via-rhine on 2.4.23-pre6 Too much work at interrupt,
> > > > status=0x00001000.
> > > >
> > > >The system used to run 2.4.22 and did not have this too much work
> > > >problem. There were some other hardware changes. The system used to be
> > > >a Pentium 100 on a Triton 430FX chipset Intel Advanced/EV board. Now it
> > > >is a K6 2 - 500 on a Via Apollo MVP3 chipset on FIC VA-503+ board.
> > > >The NIC stayed the same. The kernel was recompiled and ACPI was
> > > >enabled.
> > > >
> > > >I noticed in 2.4.23-pre2 -> pre3
> > > > [netdrvr] sync with 2.5: epic100, fealnx, via-rhine, winbond-840
> > >
> > >
> > > This cset contains no functional via-rhine changes... First thing to do
> > > would be try to 2.4.23-pre2. But my main suspect would be ACPI.
> > >
> > > Jeff
> > >
> > >
> > >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: via-rhine on 2.4.23-pre6 Too much work at interrupt, status=0x00001000. (fwd)
2003-10-17 22:09 ` via-rhine on 2.4.23-pre6 Too much work at interrupt, status=0x00001000. (fwd) Jeff Garzik
2003-10-19 6:09 ` John Wong
@ 2003-10-23 4:23 ` John Wong
2003-10-24 13:02 ` Marcelo Tosatti
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: John Wong @ 2003-10-23 4:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: Linux Kernel
Could the problem detailed in the thread:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=106687979128274&w=2
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=106688008628516&w=2
with reference to 8390-based drivers affect the via-rhine driver?
John
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 06:09:02PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:27:17 -0700
> >From: John Wong <kernel@implode.net>
> >To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> >Subject: via-rhine on 2.4.23-pre6 Too much work at interrupt,
> > status=0x00001000.
> >
> >The system used to run 2.4.22 and did not have this too much work
> >problem. There were some other hardware changes. The system used to be
> >a Pentium 100 on a Triton 430FX chipset Intel Advanced/EV board. Now it
> >is a K6 2 - 500 on a Via Apollo MVP3 chipset on FIC VA-503+ board.
> >The NIC stayed the same. The kernel was recompiled and ACPI was
> >enabled.
> >
> >I noticed in 2.4.23-pre2 -> pre3
> > [netdrvr] sync with 2.5: epic100, fealnx, via-rhine, winbond-840
>
>
> This cset contains no functional via-rhine changes... First thing to do
> would be try to 2.4.23-pre2. But my main suspect would be ACPI.
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: via-rhine on 2.4.23-pre6 Too much work at interrupt, status=0x00001000. (fwd)
2003-10-23 4:23 ` John Wong
@ 2003-10-24 13:02 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-10-24 22:43 ` John Wong
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Marcelo Tosatti @ 2003-10-24 13:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Wong; +Cc: Jeff Garzik, Linux Kernel
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, John Wong wrote:
> Could the problem detailed in the thread:
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=106687979128274&w=2
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=106688008628516&w=2
>
> with reference to 8390-based drivers affect the via-rhine driver?
No this is a different bug.
In previous message you said 2.4.22 also was spitting "too much work at
interrupt". Correct?
Which kernel works on this box?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: via-rhine on 2.4.23-pre6 Too much work at interrupt, status=0x00001000. (fwd)
2003-10-24 13:02 ` Marcelo Tosatti
@ 2003-10-24 22:43 ` John Wong
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: John Wong @ 2003-10-24 22:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marcelo Tosatti; +Cc: Jeff Garzik, Linux Kernel
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 11:02:30AM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, John Wong wrote:
>
> > Could the problem detailed in the thread:
> >
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=106687979128274&w=2
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=106688008628516&w=2
> >
> > with reference to 8390-based drivers affect the via-rhine driver?
>
> No this is a different bug.
>
> In previous message you said 2.4.22 also was spitting "too much work at
> interrupt". Correct?
Correct. 2.4.22 had this same problem.
> Which kernel works on this box?
I have never had a kernel that has worked with this box as is. The
2.4.22 kernel worked fine on the system before I replaced the
motherboard/CPU/RAM. 2.4.22 was compiled with Pentium optimizations for
a Pentium 100 on a 430FX chipset. 2.4.23-pre6 (now pre7) is compiled
with K6 optimizations for a K6 2 500 on a MVP3 chipset. ACPI was
initially enabled on the 23-preX kernels, but disabled when Jeff
suggested it might have been the problem. Both systems
used the same OS/harddrive/NICs.
John
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-10-24 22:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0310171852330.12627-100000@logos.cnet>
2003-10-17 22:09 ` via-rhine on 2.4.23-pre6 Too much work at interrupt, status=0x00001000. (fwd) Jeff Garzik
2003-10-19 6:09 ` John Wong
[not found] ` <20031019071012.GA13898@gambit.implode.net>
2003-10-19 7:22 ` John Wong
2003-10-23 4:23 ` John Wong
2003-10-24 13:02 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-10-24 22:43 ` John Wong
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).