linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Olien <dmo@osdl.org>
To: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
Cc: rwhron@earthlink.net, venom@sns.it, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	akpm@osdl.org, Mary Edie Meredith <maryedie@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] I/O regression after 2.6.0-test5
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 13:35:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031023203502.GA12778@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F973BC9.4080005@cyberone.com.au>


test5 didn't work with dbt2.  The database run kept hanging.
I've been running reaim, which doesn't have those problems with
older kernels, but has shown similar performance problems.

I need to also check again that reaim and dbt2 still show similar
performance issues with newer kernel versions.

I've lost my test machine for today.  But I'll try test5 as-iosched
in a test8 kernel with reaim tomorrow.  If it works well, I'll try your
following patch.  Probably get it in the mail tomorrow afternoon.

Dave

On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 12:24:09PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> 
> 
> Dave Olien wrote:
> 
> >Sorry, this patch didn't fix our performance problems.  Mary just
> >finished running dbt2 on test8 with your patch:
> >
> >NOTPM   kernel          scheduler
> >965     2.6.0-test8-np  AS
> >1632    2.6.-test6-mm4  deadline
> >
> 
> Thanks. hmm.
> And NOTPM was better with AS in test5? Does using as-iosched.c from test5
> in a test8 kernel help?
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-10-23 20:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-21 13:05 [BENCHMARK] I/O regression after 2.6.0-test5 rwhron
2003-10-21 15:57 ` Nick Piggin
2003-10-21 21:07 ` venom
2003-10-22  9:54 ` Nick Piggin
2003-10-22 18:30   ` Dave Olien
2003-10-22 19:08     ` Dave Olien
2003-10-23  2:24     ` Nick Piggin
2003-10-23  3:48       ` Nick Piggin
2003-10-23 20:35       ` Dave Olien [this message]
2003-10-23 23:07         ` Nick Piggin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-29  0:38 rwhron
2003-10-27 23:33 John Hawkes
2003-10-26 10:38 rwhron
2003-10-27 23:49 ` Dave Olien
2003-10-24 23:43 rwhron
2003-10-24 12:46 rwhron
2003-10-24  0:10 rwhron
2003-10-20  0:37 rwhron
2003-10-20  1:35 ` Nick Piggin
2003-10-20  4:52   ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-20  8:12     ` Nick Piggin
2003-10-20  4:51 ` Dave Olien
2003-10-20  7:55   ` venom
2003-10-21  4:49     ` Nick Piggin
2003-10-24 13:52 ` Magnus Andersson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031023203502.GA12778@osdl.org \
    --to=dmo@osdl.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maryedie@osdl.org \
    --cc=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
    --cc=rwhron@earthlink.net \
    --cc=venom@sns.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).