From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>
To: "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
"Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
"Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>,
linux-acpi <linux-acpi@intel.com>,
cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 3/3 Dynamic cpufreq governor and updates to ACPI P-state driver
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 20:38:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031024183852.GE28421@brodo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031023141703.GG643@openzaurus.ucw.cz> <CFF522B18982EA4481D3A3E23B83141C24B4DF@orsmsx407.jf.intel.com> <7F740D512C7C1046AB53446D3720017304B04F@scsmsx402.sc.intel.com>
Vetoed.
cpufreq_dynamic is too generic, there are different approaches == different
governors in the work which are all "dynamic".
Dominik
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 02:50:06PM -0700, Nakajima, Jun wrote:
> Me too, because it would be consistent with the other ones; i.e. how the
> user perceives them.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 01:47:49PM -0700, Moore, Robert wrote:
>
> I would vote for "cpufreq_dynamic"
>
> Bob
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 04:17:04PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Could you name it cpufreq_demand? We have enough
> TLAs as is.
> Pavwl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-24 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-21 2:56 [PATCH] 3/3 Dynamic cpufreq governor and updates to ACPI P-state driver Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2003-10-21 8:38 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-10-21 9:59 ` Mattia Dongili
2003-10-21 10:17 ` Wichert Akkerman
2003-10-21 10:52 ` Mattia Dongili
2003-10-21 15:36 ` Daniel Thor Kristjansson
2003-10-21 20:32 ` Dominik Brodowski
2003-10-22 15:48 ` Daniel Thor Kristjansson
2003-10-23 14:32 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-24 18:22 ` Dominik Brodowski
2003-10-21 19:23 ` Carl Thompson
2003-10-21 20:37 ` Dominik Brodowski
2003-10-23 14:17 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-23 20:47 ` Moore, Robert
2003-10-23 21:50 ` Nakajima, Jun
2003-10-24 18:38 ` Dominik Brodowski [this message]
2003-10-24 11:27 ` Ducrot Bruno
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-24 18:52 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031024183852.GE28421@brodo.de \
--to=linux@brodo.de \
--cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
--cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox