From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262454AbTJXSmU (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Oct 2003 14:42:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262456AbTJXSmU (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Oct 2003 14:42:20 -0400 Received: from natsmtp00.rzone.de ([81.169.145.165]:62917 "EHLO natsmtp00.webmailer.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262454AbTJXSmS (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Oct 2003 14:42:18 -0400 Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 20:38:52 +0200 From: Dominik Brodowski To: "Nakajima, Jun" , "Moore, Robert" , Pavel Machek Cc: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" , "Mallick, Asit K" , linux-acpi , cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] 3/3 Dynamic cpufreq governor and updates to ACPI P-state driver Message-ID: <20031024183852.GE28421@brodo.de> References: <88056F38E9E48644A0F562A38C64FB60077914@scsmsx403.sc.intel.com> <20031023141703.GG643@openzaurus.ucw.cz> <7F740D512C7C1046AB53446D3720017304B04F@scsmsx402.sc.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031023141703.GG643@openzaurus.ucw.cz> <7F740D512C7C1046AB53446D3720017304B04F@scsmsx402.sc.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Vetoed. cpufreq_dynamic is too generic, there are different approaches == different governors in the work which are all "dynamic". Dominik On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 02:50:06PM -0700, Nakajima, Jun wrote: > Me too, because it would be consistent with the other ones; i.e. how the > user perceives them. On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 01:47:49PM -0700, Moore, Robert wrote: > > I would vote for "cpufreq_dynamic" > > Bob On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 04:17:04PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Could you name it cpufreq_demand? We have enough > TLAs as is. > Pavwl