From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263679AbTJ0AAz (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Oct 2003 19:00:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263689AbTJ0AAz (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Oct 2003 19:00:55 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:5248 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263679AbTJ0AAy (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Oct 2003 19:00:54 -0500 Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 16:01:58 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.0-test9 Message-Id: <20031026160158.74bd09c8.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote: > > From: Linus Torvalds > > > I have run 2.6.0-test6 without any problems. Switched > > to 2.6.0-test9 today. Something involving job control > > or so is broken. Several of my remote xterms hang. > > Btw, this one sounds like a known bug in bash. > > No - it is a recent kernel bug. > Mikael Pettersson noticed precisely the same thing, and says > "Reverting 2.6.0-test8-bk3's net/ipv4/tcp.c patch fixes > these problems." > And so it does. > Can someone show us the diff for this?