From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263448AbTJ0SJN (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2003 13:09:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263457AbTJ0SJN (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2003 13:09:13 -0500 Received: from smtp800.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.12.142]:18325 "HELO smtp800.mail.ukl.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263448AbTJ0SI6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2003 13:08:58 -0500 From: Bob Johnson Reply-To: livewire@gentoo.org To: Shaun Savage , jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, edt@aei.ca, nuno.silva@vgertech.com Subject: Re: kernel 2.6t9 SATA slower than 2.4.20 Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 13:08:46 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <3F9D402F.9050509@savages.net> In-Reply-To: <3F9D402F.9050509@savages.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: clearsigned data Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200310271308.53135.livewire@gentoo.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Sata driver worked well on my siimage, but lost around 30%-40% performance according to tiobench. Bob On Monday 27 October 2003 10:56 am, Shaun Savage wrote: > >Are you using CONFIG_SCSI_SATA in 2.6? > > No, but I am trying now. > GREAT is works, > but the disk went from hda back to hde > > > Jeff > > =================================================================== -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/nV8zxJgsCy9JAX0RAoMDAKCkhWzaYoOf4PT4xO+8deABSZuvwwCfSss/ 9rIz1it4fWpQ3HVzFcK/qls= =mOy2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----