From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263876AbTJ1JFP (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Oct 2003 04:05:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263888AbTJ1JFP (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Oct 2003 04:05:15 -0500 Received: from platane.lps.ens.fr ([129.199.121.28]:44941 "EHLO platane.lps.ens.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263876AbTJ1JFL (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Oct 2003 04:05:11 -0500 Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 10:03:04 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=C9ric?= Brunet To: davidm@hpl.hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: status of ipchains in 2.6? Message-ID: <20031028090304.GA19302@lps.ens.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200310280127.h9S1RM5d002140@napali.hpl.hp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In mailing-lists linux-kernel, you wrote: >I recently discovered that ipchains is rather broken. I noticed the >problem on ia64, but suspect that it's likely to affect all 64-bit >platforms (if not 32-bit platforms). A more detailed description of >the problem I'm seeing is here: > > http://tinyurl.com/sm9d I have just posted less than 12 hours ago a bug-report about a __very__ similar problem occuring on ia32. I trigger it very easily with a rsync from the client machine. I haven't been able to obtain a complete trace, though. In my case, 2.6.0-test4 is working fine. Éric Brunet