Re: ANNOUNCE: User-space System Device Enumation (uSDE)

[Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>]

On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 03:30:30PM +0100, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> ---cut---

Sweet shell script, nice job.

> So udev is 99% overhead?

To you, sure, it might be.  Don't use it then, I'm not forcing anyone.

> > 	SDE:	57328 lines
> > 	udev:	 9090 lines
>  shell script:     41 lines

Hm, how about the size of bash?

> > that udev is suffering from "lack of maintainability and bloat" if you
> > really want :)
> 
> bloat. lots of bloat. what is that tdb database for?
> filesystems are persistent. if you want to save space,
> create a tar file :-) 

Sweet, and then run everything on a in-ram compress filesystem just to
save that precious disk space.

> > p.s. yes, I know lines of code is a horrible metric, and doesn't really
> > mean squat.  I just want to point out the huge size difference between
> > the current state of udev and SDE, with pretty much identical
> > functionality from what I can tell.
> 
> I agree. lines of codes is a horrible metric, and comparing a shell
> script that uses many external commands to a c application with
> everything build is makes absolutely no sense. but I wonder why
> the off the shelf machine needs a c applications, if all those
> external commands are installed anyway.

Remember, userspace is just a load test for the kernel, who really needs
applications anyway.

</sarcasm>

greg k-h