From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: John Levon <levon@movementarian.org>
Cc: Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Post-halloween doc updates.
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 02:30:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031031023059.GL11311@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031031021425.GB24712@compsoc.man.ac.uk>
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 02:14:25AM +0000, John Levon wrote:
> Given that Ingo's reworkings led to horrendous interactive performance
> for many desktop users for a long time during 2.5, it seems a little odd
> to prefer crediting Ingo over Con given what you've said.
> mentioning that we have an O(1) scheduler, plus there has been
> significant work on interactive performance.
Preference has nothing to do with it. It comes down to one
definitive source of information.
>From MAINTAINERS ..
SCHEDULER
P: Ingo Molnar
M: mingo@elte.hu
P: Robert Love [the preemptible kernel bits]
M: rml@tech9.net
L: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
S: Maintained
Shall I add rml there too? How about the other dozen or so people
that hacked on O(1) over the last year or so? Get real, I'm
not about to waste my time going over attributions, nor further
entertain any responses in this thread.
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-31 2:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-30 14:15 Post-halloween doc updates Dave Jones
2003-10-30 15:05 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-10-30 15:18 ` Dave Jones
2003-10-30 16:55 ` John Bradford
2003-10-30 15:15 ` Holger Schurig
2003-10-30 15:19 ` Dave Jones
2003-10-30 16:52 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-10-30 17:27 ` Chris Wright
2003-10-30 18:38 ` Dave Jones
2003-10-30 18:44 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-10-30 18:53 ` Dave Jones
2003-10-30 17:01 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-10-30 19:08 ` Philipp Matthias Hahn
2003-10-30 22:16 ` bd
2003-10-31 1:32 ` Gene Heskett
2003-10-31 12:50 ` Thierry Vignaud
2003-10-30 23:11 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-10-31 0:16 ` Dave Jones
2003-10-31 2:14 ` John Levon
2003-10-31 2:30 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2003-10-31 7:34 ` ide-scsi is working [was: Post-halloween doc updates.] Nuno Silva
2003-10-31 13:42 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-10-31 12:25 ` Post-halloween doc updates Andreas Jellinghaus
2003-10-31 15:35 ` Paul Dickson
2003-10-31 15:06 ` Ian Soboroff
2003-10-31 15:24 ` Russell King
2003-10-31 16:00 ` Aristeu Sergio Rozanski Filho
2003-10-31 16:03 ` Ian Soboroff
2003-10-31 16:14 ` Russell King
2003-10-31 17:56 ` Michael Clark
2003-11-10 23:43 ` bill davidsen
2003-11-11 1:09 ` Rob Landley
2003-11-10 14:11 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-31 15:53 ` Ingo Oeser
2003-10-31 23:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2003-11-01 7:44 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031031023059.GL11311@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org \
--cc=levon@movementarian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox