From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263293AbTJaNBT (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Oct 2003 08:01:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263294AbTJaNBS (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Oct 2003 08:01:18 -0500 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:34208 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263293AbTJaNAk (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Oct 2003 08:00:40 -0500 Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 14:00:41 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: Thomas Schlichter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Processes receive SIGSEGV if TCQ is enabled Message-ID: <20031031130041.GI7314@suse.de> References: <200310301601.55588.schlicht@uni-mannheim.de> <200310301848.19065.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200310301848.19065.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 30 2003, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > [ Jens - IDE TCQ maintainer 8) added to cc: ] Not really (added, that is :) > Could you also send dmesg output and retry with vanilla -test9? It's probably via + tcq, that drive is known good with ide-tcq. At least I've never seen problems with it. -- Jens Axboe