From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263705AbTKKTWj (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Nov 2003 14:22:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263697AbTKKTVf (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Nov 2003 14:21:35 -0500 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.31.123]:16341 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263695AbTKKTVb (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Nov 2003 14:21:31 -0500 Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 15:11:08 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Ian Soboroff , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: Post-halloween doc updates. Message-ID: <20031110141107.GU643@openzaurus.ucw.cz> References: <20031030141519.GA10700@redhat.com> <9cfd6cdla4o.fsf@rogue.ncsl.nist.gov> <20031031152453.F4556@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031031152453.F4556@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > Doesn't work for me. > > Now, taking off my "open source co-operative hat" and placing my > "reality" hat on, I'd suggest that anyone who finds that APM doesn't > work to consider it a dead loss - It's an obsolete technology, and > therefore no one is interested in it anymore. Actually APM is so simple technology (very similar to ACPI S1) that I'm reasonably sure we'll get it working in 2.6.5. -- Pavel Written on sharp zaurus, because my Velo1 broke. If you have Velo you don't need...