From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263598AbTKQRuY (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Nov 2003 12:50:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263605AbTKQRuY (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Nov 2003 12:50:24 -0500 Received: from jupiter.loonybin.net ([208.248.0.98]:34578 "EHLO jupiter.loonybin.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263598AbTKQRuU (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Nov 2003 12:50:20 -0500 Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 11:50:10 -0600 From: Zinx Verituse To: Vojtech Pavlik Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: serio chaining in 2.6.x? Message-ID: <20031117175010.GA6101@bliss> References: <20031117030652.GA4108@bliss> <20031117074748.GA27370@ucw.cz> <20031117163729.GA5430@bliss> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031117163729.GA5430@bliss> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 10:37:29AM -0600, Zinx Verituse wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 08:47:48AM +0100, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 09:06:52PM -0600, Zinx Verituse wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > What do you folks think the best method for chaining the > > > serio drivers is? > > > > You grab the port. Then you create a new one and register it. And you > > forward all data that's not destined for you through to the new serio > > port. > > > > -- > > Vojtech Pavlik > > Many thanks -- I hadn't considered creating a new port, and I'm sure this > solution will work perfectly :) > Unfortunately, I hit a snag... I can't see a way to rescan or disconnect all the ports that need intercepted (or, indeed, any of them that are already connected) Suggestions welcome :) -- Zinx Verituse