From: Jurriaan <thunder7@xs4all.nl>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Matrox Acceleration Probably_Just_Cosmetic Bug
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 21:35:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031117203533.GA6727@middle.of.nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031117194845.GC18448@vana.vc.cvut.cz>
From: Petr Vandrovec <vandrove@vc.cvut.cz>
Date: Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 08:48:45PM +0100
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 09:46:01PM +1100, Tudor wrote:
> > If you select "Matrox Acceleration" either built in or as module there
> > are two options:
> > - G100/G200/G400/G450/G500 support
> > and
> > - G100/G200/G400 support
> >
> > If you select the first, the second disappears.
> > If you select the second, the first stays.
>
> It is feature, so you can "extend" your driver later when you decide. Both
> config options points to the same sources. In the past there was option
> "G100-G550 support" with "Secondary head on G450/G550". Unfortunately
> G450 and G550 users were connecting monitor to the secondary output,
> and then complaining that they do not see anything on the monitor.
> So now this option is implicitly enabled when you select first choice,
> and disabled when you select second one.
>
> Unless you cannot afford about 16KB for secondary CRTC driver, you should
> select first choice, as it gives you better upgrade path.
> Petr Vandrovec
>
I've always found this confusing as well, as I use a G450 but never use
the secondary output.
How about
- G100-550 support (including secondary output)
- G100-400 support (single head only)
then mention in the help-text that secondary output is only usable after
running program %%%% ?
Jurriaan
--
She opened her eyes and gazed bleakly at him. "And is it your idea that
discussing this interesting subject will make us friends?"
Guy Gavriel Kay - Tigana
Debian (Unstable) GNU/Linux 2.6.0-test9-mm3 4259 bogomips 0.16 0.11
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-17 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-16 10:46 Matrox Acceleration Probably_Just_Cosmetic Bug Tudor
2003-11-17 19:48 ` Petr Vandrovec
2003-11-17 20:35 ` Jurriaan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031117203533.GA6727@middle.of.nowhere \
--to=thunder7@xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox