Re: transmeta cpu code question

H. Peter Anvin
2003-11-20T17:33:35Z

Followup to: <20031120083827.GL3748@schottelius.org>
By author: Nico Schottelius <nico-mutt@schottelius.org>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> I am still interested whether there are possibilities to
> a) use the crusoe without the morphing software (to use its native
> command set)

No. You really don't want to -- the native instruction set doesn't
look like anything Linux likes to see, and worse, there are binary
incompatibilities not just from processor to processor but sometimes
from silicon revision to silicon revision.

It's also not faster in any meaningful way, since the dynamic
translator does optimistic optimization.

> b) to fine tune Linux to my specific processor, to make it use all
> available feautures the processor has.

The biggest problem we've found is that a lot of distributions will
install an i586 libc even though we have (and export) all the
necessary features. Crusoe reports family = 5 mainly to work around a
bug in Some Other Operating System[TM], but supports all
userspace-visible i686 features gcc expects.

-hpa
--
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
If you send me mail in HTML format I will assume it's spam.
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
Architectures needed: ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64