public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maneesh Soni <maneesh@in.ibm.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Patrick Mochel <mochel@osdl.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sysfs_remove_dir Vs dcache_readdir race fix
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:17:07 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031120054707.GA1724@in.ibm.com> (raw)

Hi,

sysfs_remove_dir modifies d_subdirs list which results in inconsistency
when there is concurrent dcache_readdir is going on. I think there
is no need for sysfs_remove_dir to modify d_subdirs list and removal
of dentries from d_child list is taken care in the final dput().

The folloing patch fixes this race. The patch is tested by running these two
loops simlutaneously on a SMP box.

#while true; do tree /sys/class/net > /dev/null; done

#while true; do insmod ./dummy.o; rmmod dummy.o; done


o This patch fixes sysfs_remove_dir race with dcache_readdir. There is
  no need for sysfs_remove_dir to modify the d_subdirs list for the directory
  being deleted as it is taken care in the final dput. Modifying this list
  results in inconsistent d_subdirs list and causes infinite loop in 
  concurrently occuring dcache_readdir.


 fs/sysfs/dir.c |    4 +---
 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff -puN fs/sysfs/dir.c~sysfs_remove_dir-race-fix fs/sysfs/dir.c
--- linux-2.6.0-test9-bk24/fs/sysfs/dir.c~sysfs_remove_dir-race-fix	2003-11-20 10:36:13.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.0-test9-bk24-maneesh/fs/sysfs/dir.c	2003-11-20 10:38:32.000000000 +0530
@@ -122,8 +122,8 @@ void sysfs_remove_dir(struct kobject * k
 	node = dentry->d_subdirs.next;
 	while (node != &dentry->d_subdirs) {
 		struct dentry * d = list_entry(node,struct dentry,d_child);
-		list_del_init(node);
 
+		node = node->next;
 		pr_debug(" o %s (%d): ",d->d_name.name,atomic_read(&d->d_count));
 		if (d->d_inode) {
 			d = dget_locked(d);
@@ -139,9 +139,7 @@ void sysfs_remove_dir(struct kobject * k
 			spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
 		}
 		pr_debug(" done\n");
-		node = dentry->d_subdirs.next;
 	}
-	list_del_init(&dentry->d_child);
 	spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
 	up(&dentry->d_inode->i_sem);
 

_

-- 
Maneesh Soni
Linux Technology Center, 
IBM Software Lab, Bangalore, India
email: maneesh@in.ibm.com
Phone: 91-80-5044999 Fax: 91-80-5268553
T/L : 9243696

             reply	other threads:[~2003-11-20  5:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-20  5:47 Maneesh Soni [this message]
2003-11-20  5:49 ` [PATCH] sysfs_remove_dir Vs dcache_readdir race fix viro
2003-11-20  5:56   ` Maneesh Soni
2003-11-20 10:25     ` Maneesh Soni
2003-11-20 15:17       ` Andrew Morton
2003-11-20 16:40         ` Dipankar Sarma
2003-11-20 18:44         ` viro
2003-11-20 18:43       ` viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031120054707.GA1724@in.ibm.com \
    --to=maneesh@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mochel@osdl.org \
    --cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox