From: Maneesh Soni <maneesh@in.ibm.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Patrick Mochel <mochel@osdl.org>,
Al Viro <viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sysfs_remove_dir Vs dcache_readdir race fix
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:17:07 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031120054707.GA1724@in.ibm.com> (raw)
Hi,
sysfs_remove_dir modifies d_subdirs list which results in inconsistency
when there is concurrent dcache_readdir is going on. I think there
is no need for sysfs_remove_dir to modify d_subdirs list and removal
of dentries from d_child list is taken care in the final dput().
The folloing patch fixes this race. The patch is tested by running these two
loops simlutaneously on a SMP box.
#while true; do tree /sys/class/net > /dev/null; done
#while true; do insmod ./dummy.o; rmmod dummy.o; done
o This patch fixes sysfs_remove_dir race with dcache_readdir. There is
no need for sysfs_remove_dir to modify the d_subdirs list for the directory
being deleted as it is taken care in the final dput. Modifying this list
results in inconsistent d_subdirs list and causes infinite loop in
concurrently occuring dcache_readdir.
fs/sysfs/dir.c | 4 +---
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff -puN fs/sysfs/dir.c~sysfs_remove_dir-race-fix fs/sysfs/dir.c
--- linux-2.6.0-test9-bk24/fs/sysfs/dir.c~sysfs_remove_dir-race-fix 2003-11-20 10:36:13.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.0-test9-bk24-maneesh/fs/sysfs/dir.c 2003-11-20 10:38:32.000000000 +0530
@@ -122,8 +122,8 @@ void sysfs_remove_dir(struct kobject * k
node = dentry->d_subdirs.next;
while (node != &dentry->d_subdirs) {
struct dentry * d = list_entry(node,struct dentry,d_child);
- list_del_init(node);
+ node = node->next;
pr_debug(" o %s (%d): ",d->d_name.name,atomic_read(&d->d_count));
if (d->d_inode) {
d = dget_locked(d);
@@ -139,9 +139,7 @@ void sysfs_remove_dir(struct kobject * k
spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
}
pr_debug(" done\n");
- node = dentry->d_subdirs.next;
}
- list_del_init(&dentry->d_child);
spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
up(&dentry->d_inode->i_sem);
_
--
Maneesh Soni
Linux Technology Center,
IBM Software Lab, Bangalore, India
email: maneesh@in.ibm.com
Phone: 91-80-5044999 Fax: 91-80-5268553
T/L : 9243696
next reply other threads:[~2003-11-20 5:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-20 5:47 Maneesh Soni [this message]
2003-11-20 5:49 ` [PATCH] sysfs_remove_dir Vs dcache_readdir race fix viro
2003-11-20 5:56 ` Maneesh Soni
2003-11-20 10:25 ` Maneesh Soni
2003-11-20 15:17 ` Andrew Morton
2003-11-20 16:40 ` Dipankar Sarma
2003-11-20 18:44 ` viro
2003-11-20 18:43 ` viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031120054707.GA1724@in.ibm.com \
--to=maneesh@in.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mochel@osdl.org \
--cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox