From: Akinobu Mita <mita@miraclelinux.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [BUG 2.4] NFS unlocking operation accesses invalid file struct
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 20:00:32 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200311252000.32094.mita@miraclelinux.com> (raw)
Hi,
I'm investigating the reliabiblity of the NFS locking.
I noticed that possible NFS locking related crash in the following situation:
process A
process B
-- A and B are sharing task's fd array.
(clone()d with CLONE_FILES)
file F
-- The file on NFS
file descriptor p (equivalent to file struct P)
file descriptor q (equivalent to file struct Q)
-- p and q are individual file descriptors for the file F
(not dup()-ed)
file lock L
-- The file lock L has been locked via fcntl() for the file descriptor q by
the process B (connects with file struct Q)
1. The process A closes the file descriptor p.
In filp_close(), the process A closes file struct P, it unlocks all the
file locks related to the i-node of the file F, which are held by the
processes sharing the same fd array process A refers to. (locks_remove_posix)
2. The process A unlocks the file lock L.
First of all, the process A removes the file lock L from the list of the
file locks related to the i-node of the file F. Then, it calls the `nfs_lock'
to do the unlocking operation for its file-system dependent operation.
3. While executing the `nfs_lock' with RPC procedure, the process A
sleep on there for a while.
On the other side.
4. The process B closes the file descriptor q.
Because process A has already remove the entry of the file lock from the list,
process B cannot find the entry so it just exit without doing anything about
the list.
System treats the closing operation carried out by the process B is done,
while the process A is sleeping.
The process B invalidates the file struct Q because it is no longer needed.
But, the process A has not finished the operation of the unlocking
for file lock L yet.
5. When the process A wakes up, it attempts to execute remaining unlocking
works, and accesses the file struct Q.
Because the file struct Q is no longer valid, it is likely to cause NULL
pointer dereference.
Also, the file struct Q might be used by other files. in this case, the data
contradiction would happen.
Does anyone have a idea of how to fix it ?
Regards,
--
Akinobu Mita
next reply other threads:[~2003-11-25 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-25 11:00 Akinobu Mita [this message]
2003-11-26 0:35 ` [BUG 2.4] NFS unlocking operation accesses invalid file struct Trond Myklebust
2003-11-27 11:54 ` Akinobu Mita
2003-11-27 15:15 ` Gene Heskett
2003-11-27 16:23 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-12-10 1:06 ` Akinobu Mita
2003-12-10 1:27 ` hanasaki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200311252000.32094.mita@miraclelinux.com \
--to=mita@miraclelinux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox