Re: Oops with tmpfs on both 2.4.22 & 2.6.0-test11

William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-01T08:00:28Z

On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 05:21:26PM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> This is significantly different in nature from the 2.4 oops, since
>> 2.4 hit NULL and this pointer is total garbage.
>> Either it's a double bitflip or even worse is afoot.

On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 08:58:24AM +0100, Andries Brouwer wrote:
> This oops is completely understood. I was going to write to you
> yesterday evening, but then saw that Oleg Drokin already had
> written. Didnt you see his mail?

I'm sorry if my mail came out after Oleg's reply; I at least started
writing it before his arrived on my system.

-- wli