From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264348AbTLBUJK (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 15:09:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264351AbTLBUJK (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 15:09:10 -0500 Received: from mail3.ithnet.com ([217.64.64.7]:18067 "HELO heather-ng.ithnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S264348AbTLBUJH (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 15:09:07 -0500 X-Sender-Authentication: net64 Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 21:09:04 +0100 From: Stephan von Krawczynski To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.4 future Message-Id: <20031202210904.48706476.skraw@ithnet.com> In-Reply-To: <20031202120315.GK13388@conectiva.com.br> References: <200312011226.04750.nbensa@gmx.net> <20031202115436.GA10288@physik.tu-cottbus.de> <20031202120315.GK13388@conectiva.com.br> Organization: ith Kommunikationstechnik GmbH X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 10:03:15 -0200 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 12:54:36PM +0100, Ionut Georgescu escreveu: > > I can only second that. We've been using XFS here since the days of > > 2.4.0-testxx and the only problems we've had were sitting between the > > chair and the keyboard. > > So if there is no problems at all using it as a patch why add this to a > kernel that is phasing out? Because it is _not_. I really wonder how many of you have read this list up to 2.4.11 release ... Is there some human-memory-loss-virus flooding the area ? Please stay serious. Stephan