From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263642AbTLDWcg (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Dec 2003 17:32:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263636AbTLDWb6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Dec 2003 17:31:58 -0500 Received: from holomorphy.com ([199.26.172.102]:54737 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263632AbTLDWao (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Dec 2003 17:30:44 -0500 Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 14:30:32 -0800 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Zwane Mwaikambo Cc: Jason Walker , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: Unable to address 1GB RAM in 2.4.19 or later Message-ID: <20031204223032.GA8039@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Zwane Mwaikambo , Jason Walker , Linux Kernel References: <20031204181014.QPLW12995.imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Jason Walker wrote: >> Both are SMP kernels. The hardware is a Compaq Proliant 5000R, quad pentium pro >> 200mhz (256k cache models). >> Any thoughts on this? Is there any other information needed to address this >> issue? Please let me know what I can do to assist in correcting this bug. On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 05:21:14PM -0500, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > You are using mem= what happens without it? I wonder if mem= is broken > again. Both of the BIOS-88 tables match; for some reason 2.4.18 ignored the fact it was only reporting 16MB. It should see an e820... -- wli