From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265295AbTLGD0b (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Dec 2003 22:26:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265296AbTLGD0a (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Dec 2003 22:26:30 -0500 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([65.200.24.183]:35270 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265295AbTLGD03 (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Dec 2003 22:26:29 -0500 Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 19:22:52 -0800 From: Greg KH To: "Collins, Bernard F. (Skip)" Cc: "''linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org' '" Subject: Re: Visor USB hang Message-ID: <20031207032251.GA28879@kroah.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 12:52:52PM -0500, Collins, Bernard F. (Skip) wrote: > > Greg KH wrote: > >On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 09:49:31AM -0500, Bernard Collins wrote: > > On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 19:24, Greg KH wrote: > > > Sounds like a uhci timing issue :( > > Does :( mean that it is not likely to be fixed? If so, is that because > usb-uhci is going to be deprecated in favor of uhci? Well, in 2.6, uhci turned into uhci-hcd and the usb-uhci driver disappeared. > >> So is there a downside to uhci compared to usb-uhci? > > > Not that I know of, it's what I use... > > I did find one problem on my machine: VMware USB support depends on > usb-uhci. Oh, and my USB storage keychain device works with usb-uhci but not > uhci. I've run vmware just fine with uhci, it just seems that some distros prefer usb-uhci. But use what works for you. greg k-h