From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S264422AbTLGMvP (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Sun, 7 Dec 2003 07:51:15 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264423AbTLGMvO
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sun, 7 Dec 2003 07:51:14 -0500
Received: from delerium.codemonkey.org.uk ([81.187.208.145]:57050 "EHLO
	delerium.codemonkey.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S264422AbTLGMvO (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 7 Dec 2003 07:51:14 -0500
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 12:41:54 +0000
From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nuno Monteiro <nmonteiro@uk2.net>,
       torvalds@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: linking problem with 2.6.0-test6-bk10 (fwd)
Message-ID: <20031207124154.GQ19260@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Nuno Monteiro <nmonteiro@uk2.net>, torvalds@osdl.org
References: <20031207114359.GU20739@fs.tum.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20031207114359.GU20739@fs.tum.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 12:44:00PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
 > Hi Dave,
 > 
 > the trivial patch by Nuno Monteiro forwarded below still applies against
 > -test11. Is there a reason why it wasn't applied?

Another one that Linus deemed 'not critical' I guess.
I've been scooping up a bunch of these ready for when the 'time is right'.

		Dave