From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265411AbTLHN40 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2003 08:56:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265412AbTLHN4Z (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2003 08:56:25 -0500 Received: from mail3.ithnet.com ([217.64.64.7]:42476 "HELO heather-ng.ithnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S265411AbTLHN4Y (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2003 08:56:24 -0500 X-Sender-Authentication: net64 Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 14:56:22 +0100 From: Stephan von Krawczynski To: linux-ns83820@kvack.org Cc: linux-kernel Subject: Problem Report: ns83820 / 802.1Q vlan / 2.4.23 Message-Id: <20031208145622.52d4ea11.skraw@ithnet.com> Organization: ith Kommunikationstechnik GmbH X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, I just experienced a problem with ns83820 and 802.1Q vlan support. It seems that incoming packets get dropped if the device is connected to a tagged switch port. Reducing the mtu solves the problem but is of course not nice. I remember some old docs where it says there can be problems because of the oversized tagged packets. Intel e100 seems to work flawlessly in same setup. Regards, Stephan