From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265505AbTLHQez (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:34:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265496AbTLHQbp (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:31:45 -0500 Received: from havoc.gtf.org ([63.247.75.124]:41130 "EHLO havoc.gtf.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265485AbTLHQbL (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:31:11 -0500 Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:31:09 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: Stephan von Krawczynski , mark@symonds.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, William Lee Irwin III Subject: Re: 2.4.23 hard lock, 100% reproducible. Message-ID: <20031208163108.GA29407@gtf.org> References: <20031208165423.555c5783.skraw@ithnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 02:15:27PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > > > On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 08:17:30 -0200 (BRST) > > Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > > > Mark, > > > > > > Please try the latest BK tree. There was a known bug in the netfilter code > > > which could cause the lockups. > > > > ...which leads me to the most-simple question: where can I find a changelog for > > 2.4.23-bkX from www.kernel.org ? Inside ? > > I believe there is nothing which generates 2.4.2x-bk changelogs right now. It has been automatically generated for a while now ;-) ... http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/snapshots/patch-2.4.23-bk5.log http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/snapshots/patch-2.4.23-bk6.log