From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265847AbTLINoI (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2003 08:44:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265848AbTLINoI (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2003 08:44:08 -0500 Received: from smithers.nildram.co.uk ([195.112.4.54]:31505 "EHLO smithers.nildram.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265847AbTLINoF (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2003 08:44:05 -0500 Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 13:45:51 +0000 From: Joe Thornber To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: Joe Thornber , Linux Mailing List Subject: Re: Device-mapper submission for 2.4 Message-ID: <20031209134551.GG472@reti> References: <20031209115806.GA472@reti> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 11:15:08AM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > I believe 2.6 is the right place for the device mapper. So what's the difference between a new filesystem like XFS and a new device driver like dm ? - Joe