From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266145AbTLIVPk (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2003 16:15:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266152AbTLIVPk (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2003 16:15:40 -0500 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:47121 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266145AbTLIVOp (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2003 16:14:45 -0500 Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 21:14:40 +0000 From: Russell King To: Matthew Reppert Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Guennadi Liakhovetski , Patrick Mochel Subject: Re: [OOPS] 2.6.0-test11 sysfs Message-ID: <20031209211440.A16651@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Reppert , Guennadi Liakhovetski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Guennadi Liakhovetski , Patrick Mochel References: <1070992648.27231.7.camel@minerva> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <1070992648.27231.7.camel@minerva>; from repp0017@tc.umn.edu on Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 11:57:28AM -0600 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 11:57:28AM -0600, Matthew Reppert wrote: > Try this patch. (Patrick, is this the sane thing to do? And is it worth > it? If so, I can do similar things to the other sysfs_create_* functions > if you would like.) Actually the "right" thing to do is to drop the file creation stuff from i82365; due to an interaction between sysfs and pcmcia, we can't register class device files in the initialisation path. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/ 2.6 Serial core